Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Eine der wichtigsten Aufgaben, die wir hier auf der SpaceWeatherLive müssen, ist, dass unsere Besucher mehr über das Weltraumwetter, wenn sie unsere Website besuchen. Das ist genau der Grund, warum wir eine große Hilfe-Bereich mit vielen Artikeln, wo wir tiefer graben in der Welt der Weltraumwetter haben. Allerdings haben wir noch empfangen eine Menge Fragen auf SpaceWeatherLive und einige dieser Fragen zurück jeder so oft. Die Fragen, die wir empfangen die am häufigsten kann nun in dieser FAQ.

Diese Übersetzung ist unvollständig - Bitte helfen Sie uns, übersetzen diese Webseite und kontaktieren Sie uns
No. First you need to understand that a solar flare doesn’t cause aurora. Solar flares can launch large clouds of solar plasma which we call coronal mass ejections and it is these coronal mass ejections that can produce aurora when they arrive at our planet. We also need to know that not every solar flare launches a coronal mass ejection. In fact, most solar flares do not! If we do have a strong and eruptive solar flare, it also needs to come from a sunspot region that is close to the center of the Earth-facing solar disk or else there is a risk that the coronal mass ejection is launched in a direction away from Earth. While the light of a solar flare takes just 8 minutes to reach our planet, these coronal mass ejections travel at much slower speeds. Very fast coronal mass ejections can travel the Sun-Earth distance in just one day but these are very rare. Most coronal mass ejections take two to four days to arrive at Earth.
There are no accurate ways to predict hours in advance where aurora might be seen and also not at what exact time. The auroral oval is normally at its thickest around local midnight but of course the solar wind conditions at Earth also need to be favorable for aurora at your specific location. It is not impossible to see aurora early in the evening or close to morning if the solar wind conditions are favorable enough for your location. You can only accurately estimate if there will be chance for aurora at your location about 1 hour in advance. The Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) satellite that measures the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field parameters is located between the Sun and the Earth and it takes the solar wind anywhere from 30 minutes to about an hour to travel the distance from DSCOVR to Earth. Taking a look at the parameters measured by DSCOVR is always a great start if you wish to know if there will be a chance for aurora at your location in the near future. Want to know if there is chance at this exact moment? Then we recommend taking a look at a local magnetometer.

Any location on the high latitudes will be able to see auroras with a Kp of 4. For any location on the middle latitudes a Kp-value of 7 is needed. The low latitudes need Kp-values of 8 or 9. The Kp-value that you need of course depends on where you are located on Earth. We made a handy list which is a good guide for what Kp-value you need for any given location within the reach of the auroral ovals.

Important! Note that the locations below give you a reasonable chance to see auroras for the given Kp-index provided local viewing conditions are good. This includes but is not limited to: a clear sight towards the northern or southern horizon, no clouds, no light pollution and complete darkness.

Kp Visible from

North America:
Barrow (AK, USA) Yellowknife (NT, Canada) Gillam (MB, Canada) Nuuk (Greenland)

Reykjavik (Iceland) Tromsø (Norway) Inari (Finland) Kirkenes (Norway) Murmansk (Russia)


North America:
Fairbanks (AK, USA) Whitehorse (YT, Canada)

Mo I Rana (Norway) Jokkmokk (Sweden) Rovaniemi (Finland)


North America:
Anchorage (AK, USA) Edmonton (AB, Canada) Saskatoon (SK, Canada) Winnipeg (MB, Canada)

Tórshavn (Faeroe Islands) Trondheim (Norway) Umeå (Sweden) Kokkola (Finland) Arkhangelsk (Russia)


North America:
Calgary (AB, Canada) Thunder Bay (ON, Canada)

Ålesund (Norway) Sundsvall (Sweden) Jyväskylä (Finland)


North America:
Vancouver (BC, Canada) St. John's (NL, Canada) Billings (MT, USA) Bismarck (ND, USA) Minneapolis (MN, USA)

Oslo (Norway) Stockholm (Sweden) Helsinki (Finland) Saint Petersburg (Russia)


North America:
Seattle (WA, USA) Chicago (IL, USA) Toronto (ON, Canada) Halifax (NS, Canada)

Edinburgh (Scotland) Gothenburg (Sweden) Riga (Latvia)

Southern Hemisphere:
Hobart (Australia) Invercargill (New Zealand)


North America:
Portland (OR, USA) Boise (ID, USA) Casper (WY, USA) Lincoln (NE, USA) Indianapolis (IN, USA) Columbus (OH, USA) New York City (NY, USA)

Dublin (Ireland) Manchester (England) Hamburg (Germany) Gdańsk (Poland) Vilnius (Lithuania) Moscow (Russia)

Southern Hemisphere:
Devonport (Australia) Christchurch (New Zealand)


North America:
Salt Lake City (UT, USA) Denver (CO, USA) Nashville (TN, USA) Richmond (VA, USA)

London (England) Brussels (Belgium) Cologne (Germany) Dresden (Germany) Warsaw (Poland)

Southern Hemisphere:
Melbourne (Australia) Wellington (New Zealand)


North America:
San Francisco (CA, USA) Las Vegas (NV, USA) Albuquerque (NM, USA) Dallas (TX, USA) Jackson (MS, USA) Atlanta (GA, USA)

Paris (France) Munich (Germany) Vienna (Austria) Bratislava (Slovakia) Kiev (Ukraine)

Astana (Kazakhstan) Novosibirsk (Russia)

Southern Hemisphere:
Perth (Australia) Sydney (Australia) Auckland (New Zealand)


North America:
Monterrey (Mexico) Miami (FL, USA)

Madrid (Spain) Marseille (France) Rome (Italy) Bucharest (Romania)

Ulan Bator (Mongolia)

Southern Hemisphere:
Alice Springs (Australia) Brisbane (Australia) Ushuaia (Argentina) Cape Town (South Africa)

The Wing Kp-index that we use here on SpaceWeatherLive consists of an observed and a predicted Kp-value. The observed Kp-index receives an update every three hours so this value always represents what kind of auroral activity we had in the past. This is of course not a very helpful tool if we want to know what kind of auroral activity we are experiencing right now. That’s why the Wing Kp-index provides something unique: a predicted Kp-value. The Wing Kp-index predicts what the Kp-index might be in the near future (up to 1 hour from now) by using the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field data which comes from the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) satallite. While this is a very decent way to predict the Kp-index in the near future, it remains a prediction made by a computer program. It could predict that the Kp-index is about to hit Kp7 but it remains a prediction which can be incorrect. Live Kp-index measurements do not exist so that’s why we always recommend to keep an eye on the raw solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field data from DSCOVR as well as a local magnetometer if you really accurately want to know if there might be chance for aurora at your location.
There can be multiple reasons for such a large difference between NOAA’s predicted Kp-index and the Kp that is being observed right now. The most common reason is that NOAA predicts that a coronal mass ejection is on its way to Earth and it was expected to arrive around that specific time. However, it can very well be that the coronal mass ejection is late and thus did not arrive yet meaning the geomagnetic conditions are still calm even though significantly more activity was expected. It is very hard to accurately predict the arrival time of a coronal mass ejection so it is not uncommon that coronal mass ejections arrive several hours after the predicted arrival time.
There is no difference between Kp5 and G1. NOAA uses a five-level system called the G-scale, to indicate the severity of both observed and predicted geomagnetic activity. This scale is used to give a quick indication of the severity of a geomagnetic storm. This scale ranges from G1 to G5, with G1 being the lowest level and G5 being the highest level. Conditions below storm level are labelled as G0 but this value is not commonly used. Every G-level has a certain Kp-value associated with it. This ranges from G1 for a Kp-value of 5 to G5 for a Kp-value of 9. The table below will help you with that.
G-scale Kp Auroral activity Average frequency
G0 4 and lower Below storm
G1 5 Minor storm 1700 per cycle (900 days per cycle)
G2 6 Moderate storm 600 per cycle (360 days per cycle)
G3 7 Strong storm 200 per cycle (130 days per cycle)
G4 8 Severe storm 100 per cycle (60 days per cycle)
G5 9 Extreme storm 4 per cycle (4 days per cycle)
If you want to have a good chance to see aurora during your vacation you need to find a location as close as possible to the auroral oval. The auroral oval is an area around the magnetic poles of our planet where aurora occurs the most often, even during quiet space weather conditions. This oval is not equally large at all times: during strong geomagnetic activity, this oval will expand down to lower latitudes which means the aurora can be seen from lower latitudes but this of course does not occur very often. When on vacation you want to have the best chance to see aurora even during quiet space weather of course and that means you will likely need to travel north. It’s all about location! The auroral oval is located at the following locations during low geomagnetic activity. Northern hemisphere: Alaska, northern Canada, southern Greenland, Iceland, northern Norway, northern Sweden, northern Finland and northern Russia. For the southern lights you will have to go to Antarctica.
Yes. If the aurora is strong enough, then it’s absolutely still possible to see this phenomenon during a full moon. We do have to note that moonlight is quite strong compared to aurora so weak aurora might be hard or even impossible to see. Especially for lower latitudes, we really want as little moonlight as possible to increase our odds of seeing aurora.
That is actually correct. During the weeks around the equinox (astronomical event in which the plane of Earth's equator passes the center of the Sun) the aurora can be ever so slightly more active than at other times. Why this occurs isn’t fully understood yet but scientists believe that Earth’s tilt in some way favors enhanced geomagnetic conditions around the equinox.
Many cameras these days are capable of producing quality pictures of the aurora. However, there are a few things you need to think of if you are thinking of getting serious into the world of aurora photography. First you must get a camera that has a manual (M) mode. For aurora photography we want full control over the camera, as we are going to tell the camera exactly what it has to do for us. If you let the camera decide what settings it’s going to use than you will likely end up with a less than satisfying result. Second item you must get is a tripod as we are going to use slow shutter speeds. You cannot use a shutter speed of let’s say 10 seconds and hold the camera perfectly still by hand. You will move the camera even if you try your very best and come home with blurry pictures. So it’s very important to invest in a tripod! When it comes to lenses, kit lenses are often very much capable of producing nice pictures of the aurora borealis. If you have the money you can consider getting a wider and a faster (lower f-stop) lens so you can don’t have to expose as long but it is not vital. To reduce camera shake even more, a remote shutter release can be a very handy tool as well.
No. Aurora will still lighten up the arctic winter skies even during solar minimum. Solar minimum is a period where very few sunspots appear on our star. Few sunspots means fewer solar flares which could launch coronal mass ejections towards our planet. The normal solar wind will not disappear and coronal holes will still be present from time to time. While it’s true that there are less geomagnetic storms during the years around solar minimum, aurora will still occur at high latitudes. Because there aren’t as many strong solar storms during solar minimum as during solar maximum, it will not happen very often that the auroral oval expands to lower latitudes but aurora will always appear from time to time at locations close to the auroral oval, like northern Scandinavia and Alaska.
No. The polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field and the north-south direction (Bz) of the interplanetary magnetic field are two very different things. While it is true that we speak of a negative Bz-value when the north-south direction of the interplanetary magnetic field turns southward it is in no way related to the polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field. The polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field is not important if you are only interested in knowing if there will be chance for aurora tonight. The north-south direction (Bz) of the interplanetary magnetic field is however a vital ingredient when it comes to auroral activity but this cannot be predicted. The north-south direction (Bz) of the interplanetary magnetic field is first known when it passes the DSCOVR satellite. From there it will take the solar wind only 30 to 60 minutes to arrive at Earth.
We don’t know. There are people and even scientists who claim that the Sun is heading for a new Maunder Minimum. The Maunder Minimum was a period of about 70 years between 1645 and 1715 when very few sunspots appeared on the solar disk. While it is true that solar cycle 24 has been much less active than what we’re used to considering of the past few decades, we do not yet have an accurate way to predict solar activity so far in advance. It cannot be said right now if the Sun is about to enter a long lasting period of exceptional quietness.

Solar flares can not only differ dramatically in strength but also in duration. Some solar flares last for hours and others last only a couple of minutes. Long duration solar flares are often (but not always!) accompanied by an ejection of solar plasma. This is what we call a coronal mass ejection. Solar flares that aren’t very long in duration (impulsive) can still launch a coronal mass ejection but this is fairly rare, and if they do, these coronal mass ejections are often not as strong as coronal mass ejections that are launched during long duration events.

There isn’t an exact time limit that a solar flare needs to reach in order for it to be classified as a long duration event but the American NOAA SWPC classifies a solar flare as a long duration event if the solar flare is still in progress 30 minutes after it started.

Image: Example of an impulsive solar flare.

Image: Example of a long duration solar flare.

During solar eruptions, the Sun often emits large amounts of protons and electrons. These protons are flung out in all directions but a good bit of them follow the magnetic field lines of the interplanetary magnetic field. Because the Sun spins on her own axis, the interplanetary magnetic field forms a shape which you could compare to ballerina’s skirt. This is what we call the Parker spiral. Because of the Parker spiral, protons launched from areas near or even behind the west limb can reach Earth.

Image: The Parker Spiral.

NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory is in a geosynchronous orbit around our planet. From there it normally has an uninterrupted view of the Sun. However, twice a year near the equinoxes the Earth blocks SDO's view of the Sun for a period of time each day. These eclipses are fairly short near the beginning and end of these three week eclipse seasons but ramp up to 72 minutes in the middle. If you see an image from SDO that is completely black then you are likely looking at Earth!

Sometimes you might be lucky enough to see a much smaller object on the images from NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory: the Moon! The Moon can also appear on images from NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory but it will never block the entire Sun for a very long time like Earth does.

Animation: The Earth blocks SDO's view of the Sun.

Animation: The Moon blocks SDO's view of the Sun.

No. Almost all of the coronal mass ejections that arrive at Earth do not cause any noteworthy problems. While it is true that very strong coronal mass ejections can cause numerous issues with our modern technology like satellites and high voltage power lines, we are much better prepared for such events these days than we we’re just decades ago. The famous Halloween solar storms of 2003 were the most powerful geomagnetic storms in modern history and while this solar storm did cause some minor issues like the (temporary) loss of some satellites and a short power blackout in southern Sweden, we should not worry that a solar storm, no matter how strong, could throw us back to the dark ages.
No. There are people who claim that the Sun is responsible for seismic activity here on Earth but there is absolutely no scientific evidence that space weather and earthquakes are related in any way.
There are people who claim that they heard the aurora with their own ears during strong auroral activity but there is no solid evidence that aurora produces sound waves which the human ear could pick up. Auroral emissions occur so high up in the atmosphere (well above 50 miles/80 kilometers) and the air is so thin there, that even if the aurora produces sound waves, these waves would never be able to reach the surface of our planet.
Derzeit gibt es, auf Basis der aktuellen Daten, keine Chancen das Polarlicht auf den mittleren Breiten zu sehen

Neueste Nachrichten

Die heutige Weltraumwetter

Polarlichter schwach stark
Hohe Breiten 25% 50%
Mittlere Breiten 15% 1%
Prognostizierter Kp-Index max 4
M-Klasse Sonneneruption 1%
X-Klasse Sonneneruption 1%
Abnehmender Mond

Unterstützen Sie SpaceWeatherLive!

Um unsere vielen Besucher auch bei starkem Ansturm eine optimale Aurora Vorhersage zu geben, braucht es eine teure Serverausstattung. Unterstützen Sie dieses Projekt mit ihrem Beitrag, dass der Betrieb aufrecht erhalten werden kann!


Was ist der Aurora Alarm?

Weltraumwetter Fakten

Letzte X-Klasse:10/09/2017X8.2
Letzte M-Klasse:09/09/2017M1.1
Letzter geomagnetischer Sturm:18/09/2017Kp5 (G1)
Anzahl der fleckenlose Tage im Jahr 2017:56
Letzter fleckenlose Tag:01/08/2017

An diesem Tag in der Geschichte*

*seit 1994